Neil's Blog

The latter half of December 2025 had me playing around with the 2-meter J-pole some more, starting with replacing the crushed copper tubing feed clamps with more durable ones made from brass strip.

Brass strip feed clamps on the 2-meter J-pole

But for some reason, the resonant frequency was much too high no matter how I adjusted the clamps, so I started playing around with capacitive hats.

J-pole with two brass tubes taped to the top

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.436 @ 149.4 MHz, 54.44+j18.45Ω

My experimentation eventually led me to making hats that look kind of like flower petals, as that's what I saw when looking around online at the time.

Capacitive hat made of two large "petals" made of copper coated steel wire on the 2-meter J-Pole

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.36 @ 146.8 MHz, 38.48+j7.1Ω

Capacitive hat made of four large wire "petals" on the 2-meter J-Pole

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.319 @ 146 MHz, 37.92-j66.6mΩ

Capacitve hat made of four even larger wire "petals" on the 2-meter J-pole

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.27 @ 145.6 MHz, 41.8+j7.249Ω

#AmateurRadio #HamRadio

I spent much of December of 2025 playing around with alternative feed points and adjusting the resonant frequency with variable capacitors across the feed point.

Autotransformer toroid feed point for the 6-meter dipole, with variable capacitors across both sets of terminals

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.121 @ 55.6 MHz, 45.58+j3.222Ω

Twin coax feed for the 6-meter dipole, with a variable capacitor across the antenna feed point terminals

"Normal" feed for the 6-meter dipole, with a variable capacitor across the terminals

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.21 @ 51.15 MHz, 41.05-j164mΩ

One thing I kept seeing was a strange SWR spike at about 50 MHz, which I still can't explain to this day. Maybe the balcony railing was resonating?

Mix 61 autotransformer toroid feed, with a variable capacitor across the input terminals

NanoVNA showing the SWR spike: 1.944 @ 49.9 MHz, 93.63-j15.6Ω

I also tried a resonant stub to see if that would do anything interesting, but the SWR spike remained.

"Normal" feed for the 6-meter dipole with a parallel stub

Mix 61 autotransformer toroid feed, with a variable capacitor across the input terminals and a parallel stub

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.19 @ 51.5 MHz, 53.71-j8.222Ω

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.043 @ 49.8 MHz, 49.18-j1.909Ω

DD8SF wondered if the autotransformer was hitting resonance, but that occurred at around 69 MHz.

Mix 61 autotransformer toroid with NanoVNA: resonance around 69.4 MHz

While this experimentation didn't really pan out thanks to that weird SWR spike, don't think I'm done with this dipole! There's more experimentation to follow.

#AmateurRadio #HamRadio

Here's an antenna project that I just finished today! It's a 70cm dual quad/beam loop made from annealed copper tubing.

70cm beam loop mounted out on our balcony

I had a bear of a time trimming and tuning it, mostly because I went down the nasty “too focused to eat” kind of rabbit hole as I worked on it. I was placing the reflector far too close to the driven element to get proper gain, all because it provided a good feed point impedance. I eventually ended up with elements that were too small, too, so I had to solder extensions back on in order to restore their size. Despite all that, though, it works!

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.033 @ 446.9 MHz, 48.43-299mΩ

I have it pointed at Capitol Hill here in Seattle, since that's where the main amateur radio towers that I can see from here are.

This project also involved building the feed point in the little blue enclosure, which went through a few revisions as I went from targeting a dipole to targeting the loop shown here. And during the trimming and tuning of said loop, an earlier incarnation's internal solder joint broke, so I had to rebuild it to what's shown here. Oh, and this was the first time I've ever used a panel mount N connector, which is more suitable for UHF than “UHF” connectors, albeit with an adapter on the coax line for now.

Reflector Placement

After discussing reflector spacing with DD8SF, he sent me this from the Rothammels Antenna Book:

Graph showing the gain (directivity) based on reflector spacing, showing the optimum as around 0.22λ

This was proof enough that I had been working with the reflector far too close to the driven element earlier today, and that the final spacing I ended up with at 0.15λ was good enough for my use.

#AmateurRadio #HamRadio

Since my Yaesu FT-991a radio isn't able to operate on the 1.25-meter band, I spent some time looking for solutions to getting onto said band. This led me to the Q5 Signal L22-28HP transverter, which maps 10-meter on the radio side to 1.25-meter on the antenna side.

Q5 Signal L222-28HP

Back side of the transverter, showing the various ports

But since I didn't have an appropriate antenna for 1.25-meters, this also prompted experimentation into loops of proper sizes (which also included more playing around with 70cm).

Pair of aluminum loops for UHF

NanoVNA: SWR of 2.661 @ 260.5 MHz, 60.76-j55.13Ω

Loop antenna hanging indoors with a feed attached

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.663 @ 408.5 MHz, 50.4-j25.81Ω

At this point, I'm not sure why I started playing around with alternate feed point designs, but here are photos of what I ended up with.

PVC strip with two brass strips as the starting point for a new feed

New feed made from the above parts, with a UHF connector in the center

UHF loop with the new feed

NanoVNA: SWR of 2.168 @ 427.4 MHz, 53.23-j40.6Ω

PVC pipe with the UHF loop and NanoVNA attached

NanoVNA: SWR of 2.402 @ 422 MHz, 43.81-j41.87Ω

It was at this point where I was starting to get strange readings with the Amazon Special SMA to SMA coaxial line I'd been using, so I finally built a new line using LL-240 coax and higher quality connectors.

SMA to UHF coaxial cable and SMA to SMA coaxial cable

UHF loop connected to the new SMA to UHF cable and NanoVNA

NanoVNA: SWR of 2.008 @ 425 MHz, 99.97-j971mΩ

Much better!

#AmateurRadio #HamRadio

The exterior maintenance on our building finally completed in early November of 2025, which meant that I could put a new pair of 6-meter dipole legs made from even thicker copper pipe out.

6-meter copper pipe dipole out on the balcony, with a NanoVNA attached

Basic feed point

NanoVNA: SWR of 3.397 @ 41.4 MHz, 14.77-j2.836Ω

After cutting it down to a suitable length for the 6-meter band, I started playing around with capacitive hats for the first time

6-meter copper pipe dipole end with a capacitive hat made from brass rod

NanoVNA: SWR of 2.113 @ 52 MHz, 23.66-j297mΩ

Twin coax feed from earlier 6-meter dipole attached to new dipole

This also prompted playing around with autotransformer baluns some more.

Autotransformer for 6-meter dipole

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.544 @ 50 MHz, 32.61+j3.152Ω

#AmateurRadio #HamRadio

Still stuck inside in October of 2025, I started playing around with ways to get onto the 2-meter band, starting with halo antennas.

Halo antenna meant to target 2 meters, fed with a gamma match, sitting on a couch

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.44 @ 95.5 MHz, 40.91-j13.88Ω

Since the initial feed proved not durable enough, I built a better one out of box section PVC that is still my go-to to this day.

Gamma match feed point

Halo antenna meant to target 2 meters, fed with a gamma match, mounted in the window

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.643 @ 145.3 MHz, 82.14+j95.2mΩ

Another halo antenna in the window

NanoVNA SWR of 1.252 @ 63.5 MHz, 50.64+j11.96Ω

I started having a lot of trouble getting reliable and repeatable results with this gamma match, which I only later realized was because the aluminum hoops were painted, and paint obviously wouldn't conduct electricity. That also explained why I was having a bear of a time getting any solder to stick.

In the meantime, with the issues with the gamma match, I decided to switch to a “plain” feed instead.

Halo antenna with a "plain" feed

Feed point for that antenna, showing soldering difficulties

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.153 @ 51 MHz, 44.8+j4.207Ω

While this did prove to be a somewhat viable antenna, the feed point impedance was far too low.

Same halo antenna, trimmed down to 2 meter band, hanging on a ceiling fan

NanoVNA: SWR of 2.507 @ 145.8 MHz, 23.36+j18.69Ω

The low feed point impedance prompted me to go to the same style of twin coax impedance match that I'd used for the 6-meter dipole.

Twin coax impedance match wound around a Mix 61 toroid core

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.178 @ 143.8 MHz, 55.19-j6.871Ω

2-meter halo antenna mounted in the window, with a plastic suction cup to separate it from the metallic coating on the window

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.49 @ 141.2 MHz, 65.55-j12.76Ω

That all sounds great, right? Well, the signal and audio quality were garbage because I'd cheaped out and used Amazon RG-6 instead of coax of higher quality. That certainly taught me a lesson, and I'd go for LMR-240-75 cable for 75 ohms in the future.

#AmateurRadio #HamRadio

When I finally got my amateur radio technician license in June of 2025, I pursued the steep discount that newly-licensed hams get on the Explorer QRZ-1 radio, which included any accessories I wanted.

Explorer QRZ-1 radio

The first time I used it was later the same month, when I walked around Everett, Washington while my wife was at her motorcycle permit course. I tried joining a net without having thought to configure my radio for the repeater offset, so nobody could hear me. To this day, I never forget to do so because I felt so dumb back then!

#AmateurRadio #HamRadio

Continuing on from my earlier UHF exploits, my next 70cm antenna was made from brass tubing with the same Mix 61 bead balun.

Brass tubing 70cm dipole with its bead balun inside of a PVC pipe

However, I eventually cut it too short as I worked on getting its resonant frequency up.

Each leg is now around 10.3cm long

NanoVNA: SWR of 2.2 @ 436 MHz, 23.41+j7.66Ω

DD8SF and I thought that the issue was the feed point design, so I switched to something much simpler: brass tubing soldered onto knurled nuts that could easily be screwed onto and off studs at the feed point.

Brass tubing soldered onto knurled nuts

Brass tubing mounted to the feed point

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.357 @ 435 MHz, 36.85+j548mΩ

This design also was my first real foray into telescoping legs.

Same brass leg antenna, but with an additional level of telescoping legs and mounted in the window

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.816 @ 450 MHz, 47.89+j29.56Ω

Same brass leg antenna, but with an a third level of telescoping legs and mounted in the window

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.281 @ 432.6 MHz, 42.87+j9.035Ω

I also did some experimentation with traps and a fan dipole, neither of which really panned out.

Antenna trap on a telescoping brass tubing section

Fan dipole mounted on the same feed as above

NanoVNA for fan dipole: SWR of 1.499 @ 429.6 MHz, 74.89-j1.61Ω

The last thing I tried was a super chunky pair of aluminum tubes, targeting maximum bandwidth. DD8SF said that it was far too large for what the NanoVNA was showing, but we later determined that the issue had to do with a metallic coating on the windowpane.

Off-center dipole made of thick aluminum tubing, mounted to the same feed as above

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.792 @ 420 MHz, 28.07+j3.136Ω

#AmateurRadio #HamRadio

September 2025 was quite a time. In addition to only being able to do my antenna stuff indoors, it was full-on unhealthy to be outside because of wildfire smoke!

Red Sun and sky because of wildfire smoke, with some dark clouds in front

Wildfires and their smoke only started becoming a major issue in 2017, which is incidentally the year my now-spouse moved in. We still talk about how it rained ash while we were walking around one day back then.

#Seattle #wawx

Since I was stuck doing antenna stuff indoors in September of 2025, I decided to start playing around with UHF stuff, starting with this antenna, which didn't quite work:

70cm dipole with sleeve balun

NanoVNA: SWR of 3.710 @ 400 MHz, 14.34+j12.09Ω

I then tried a toroid feed, which I now know isn't suitable for 70cm because coils tend to start resonating before even hitting that band.

1:1 current balun feed

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.406 @ 433 MHz, 51.92-j17.3Ω

I still went with it anyway, though!

70cm dipole with toroid balun feed

NanoVNA: SWR of 1.285 @ 442.8 MHz, 39.57-j4.057Ω

Since coils really aren't suitable for this band, I ended up switching to a Mix 61 bead balun instead, but the resulting impedance wasn't good, most likely because of the surroundings:

70cm dipole with a balun made of four Mix 61 beads

NanoVNA: SWR of 2.947 @ 435.9 MHz, 16.97-j64.7mΩ

And just for fun, I threw together a basic dipole using a pair of Red Bull cans with the same bead balun, which ended up faring about the same

Red Bull dipole

NanoVNA: SWR of 2.235 @ 435.6 MHz, 22.38-j962mΩ

Even though none of those worked well enough for my taste, I didn't give up there! Tune in next time for more UHF shenanigans.

#AmateurRadio #HamRadio